Where AI is involved
| Situation | What AI does | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| Preliminary field check in the PhDr. application | assesses whether the field and topic are related, labelled “AI – supporting material only” | guarantor and rector |
| AI consultant for the rigorosum thesis | feedback on six thesis milestones, practice discussion of theses | the applicant writes the thesis; reviewers and the board never see AI output |
| AI tutor in courses | explains the material, answers questions, gives feedback on exercises | the tutor (grading) |
| Draft reviews | prepares a draft review for a reviewer or supervisor | reviewer / supervisor edits and signs |
| Exams | no AI is used for questions or grading during exams | the board / the tutor |
Rules we follow
- The use of AI is governed by Directive 23/2026 on the use of artificial intelligence and related VŠTE regulations.
- Students and applicants declare the use of AI in the declaration attached to their work.
- Every use of AI that affects a procedure is recorded in an audit log (model, version, input, output, human intervention); it is kept for 400 days and then reduced to metadata.
- AI systems are deployed as supporting tools within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act); decisions on study results and admission are made exclusively by people.
- Questions about AI: podpora@euversa.com.